Friday, October 31, 2008

The official website:
http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/
-sign up here-

The Goal:
The Means is the End:
We intend to restore the fundamental necessities and environmental awareness of the species through the avocation of the most current understandings of who and what we truly are, coupled with how science, nature and technology (rather than religion, politics and money) hold the keys to our personal growth, not only as individual human beings, but as a civilization, both structurally and spiritually. The central insights of this awareness is the recognition of the Emergent and Symbiotic elements of natural law and how aligning with these understandings as the bedrock of our personal and social institutions, life on earth can and will flourish into a system which will continuously grow in a positive way, where negative social consequences, such as social stratification, war, biases, elitism and criminal activity will be constantly reduced and, idealistically, eventually become nonexistent within the spectrum of human behavior itself.
This possibility is, of course, very difficult for most humans to consider, for we have been conditioned by society to think that crime, corruption and dishonesty is "the way it is" and that there will always be people who want to abuse, hurt and take advantage of others. Religion is the largest promoter of this propaganda, for the "us and them" or "good and evil" mentality promotes this false assumption.
The reality is that we live in a society that produces Scarcity. The consequence of this scarcity is that human beings must behave in self preserving ways, even if it means they have to cheat and steal in order to get what they want. Our research has concluded that Scarcity is one of the most fundamental causes of aberrant human behavior, while also leading to complex forms of neurosis in other ways. A statistical look at drug addition, crime and incarceration statistics, finds that poverty and unhealthy social conditions comprise the life experience of those who engage in such behavior.
Human beings are not good or bad... they are running, forever changing compositions of the life experience(s) that influence them. The "quality" of a human being ( if there was such a thing ) is directly related to the upbringing and thus belief systems they have been conditioned into.
This simple reality has been grossly overlooked and today people primitively think that competition, greed and corruption are "hardwired" elements of human behavior and, in turn, we must have prisons, police and hence a hierarchy of differential control in order for society to deal with these "tendencies". This is totally illogical and false.

The bottom line is that in order to change things for the better fundamentally, you must begin to address root causes. Our current society's system of "punishment" is outmoded, inhumane, and unproductive. When a serial killer is caught, most people jump up and down and scream for the death of that person. This is backwards. A truly sane society, which understands what we are and how our value systems are created, would take the individual and learn the reasons behind his or her violent actions. This information would then go to a research department which considers how to stop such conditions from occurring through education.

It is time to stop the patchwork. It is time to begin a new social approach which is updated to present day knowledge. Sadly, society today is still largely based on outmoded, superstitious dispositions and resolutions.

It is also important to point out that there are no utopias or endings. All evidence points to perpetual change on all levels. In turn, it is our personal actions everyday of our lives that mold and perpetuate the social systems we have in place. Yet, paradoxically, it is also our environmental influences which create our perspectives and hence world views. Therefore, true change will come not only from adjusting your personal understandings and decisions, but equally from changing the social structures that influence these understandings and decisions.

The elite power systems are little affected in the long run by traditional protest and political movements. We must move beyond these 'establishment rebellions' and work with a tool much more powerful:
We will stop supporting the system, while constantly advocating knowledge, peace, unity and compassion. We cannot "fight the system". Hate, anger and the 'war' mentality are failed means for change, for they perpetuate the same tools the corrupt, established power systems use to maintain control to begin with.




The Distortion and Paralysis:
When we understand that all systems are Emergent and constantly in a state of evolution, along with the reality that we are all Symbiotically connected to nature and each other in the most simple yet profound ways, forcing the realization that our personal integrity is only as high as the integrity of the rest of society, we then see how twisted and backwards our social establishments are and how their perpetuation is largely the cause of the social instability in society. For example, the Monetary System has been long deemed a positive force in society due to its claim to produce incentive and progress. In actuality, the monetary system has become a vehicle for division and totalitarian control.
It is the ultimate form of "Divide and Conquer" for at its very core are the assumptions that (1) We must fight each other in order to survive. (2) Humans must have this reward "Incentive" to do anything meaningful.

As far as Number 1 (We must fight each other in order to survive.), this characteristic of 'competition' in the system guarantees corruption in society on every level, for the basis is "us against them". Many argue that the "free market system" is good... but it is corrupt in the modern day due to bad policies, favoritism, bailouts, etc. They assume that if a "pure" free market was allowed to flourish then it would be okay. This is false, for what you are seeing today IS the Freemarket at work, with all its differential advantage and corruption. No laws will ever stop the insider trading, collusion, monopoly, labor abuse, pollution, planned obsolescence or the like... this is what the competition based system produces without fail, for it is based on the premise of taking advantage of others for profit. Period.

We must begin to transition out of these oppressive ideals and move towards a system which is "designed" to support human beings... not force them to fight in order to survive. As far as Number 2, (Humans must have this reward "Incentive" to do anything meaningful.) this is just a sad and an incredibly negative perspective of the human being in general. To assume that a person must be "structurally motivated" or hence "forced" into doing anything, is just absurd. Think back to when you were a child and had no idea what money even was. You played, were curious and did many things... why? Because you wanted to. However, as time goes on in our system, that natural curiosity and self-motivation is stripped away from people, as they are forced to conform to the specialized, compartmentalized, nearly predefined labor system in order to survive. This, in turn, often creates a natural rebellion within the person due to the forced obligation, and this is how we came up with "leisure" and "work" separations. The laziness assumed to exist by the monetary system proponents (who claim it produces incentive) do not recognize this. In a true society, people would follow their natural inclinations and work to contribute to society not because they are "paid" for it, but because they have a greater awareness which recognizes that contributing to society helps them just as much as everyone else. This is the heightened state of awareness we hope to communicate. Your reward for contributing to society is the well being of that society... which, in turn, furthers your well being.

Now, putting things into perspective, it is important to understand that our world is currently run, undeniably, by a small group of dominant men in high positions of those institutions which are most dominant in society- Business and Finance. The establishment of government is in tandem with the influence and power of corporations and banks. The life blood is money, which is, in fact, an illusion that now has little relevance to society and serves as a tool for manipulation and division along a kind of social organization that guarantees elitism, crime, war and social stratification.

Simultaneously, individuals are taught that being "correct" is what creates their value as human beings. This state of being "correct" is directly related to the prevailing values of society itself. Therefore, those who accept and support the social system's views are considered "normal", while those who disagree are considered "abnormal" or even "subversive". Whether it is the dogma of a unique social tradition, or the alignment with a worldwide establishment religion, the basis is the same: Intellectual Materialism.
As we realize that knowledge and hence our institutions are always evolving, we see that any belief system which claims to "know" anything, without allowing for dispute, is a failed perspective. Religion, with its foundation in faith, is the king of this distortion, as it claims to know something definitively about the most complex and elusive origins of human kind, and this simply is not possible in an emergent universe.
That being said, it is then realized that equally as dangerous as the Establishment Power Structures, are the people who have been conditioned to completely accept the static understandings put forth by these systems... therefore becoming: "Self Appointed Guardians of the Status Quo". This applies to every system, especially political, financial and religious systems. Since people's identities become associated with the doctrines of a Country, Religion or Business ethic, it often becomes very difficult for a person to change, for his or her identity has become combined with the ideologies which have been imposed upon them. Therefore, they perpetuate the doctrine of the institution, simply to maintain their personal integrity, as they see it.
We must break this cycle, for it paralyses our growth not only as individuals, but as a society.




The Truth and Transition:
Once we understand that the integrity of our personal existences are directly related to the integrity of the earth, life and all other human beings, we then have our path predefined for us. In turn, once we realize that it is science, technology and hence human creativity which creates progress in our lives, we are then able to recognize what our true priorities are for social and personal growth and progress. These points denoted, we can then see that Religion, Politics and the Money/Competition based Labor system are outdated modes of social operation, which must now be addressed and outgrown. Our avocation is to achieve a social system which operates without money or politics, while allowing superstition to work itself out as education flourishes. It isn't the right of any person to tell another what to believe, for no human has a full understanding of anything. However, if we pay attention to the natural processes of life, we then see how we can align with nature and thus our path becomes more clear.
For example, many people are worried about population growth on the planet, while very spooky comments by despotic figures like Henry Kissinger claim that some kind of "reduction" is needed. This is, of course, very scary. However, the real question remains: Is population growth really that bad? The answer is that from a scientific perspective the earth can handle many, many times more people if need be, once high technology is harnessed. 70% of our planet is water and cities in the sea ( one of many projects by Jacque Fresco ) are the next step. In turn, education about life operations will inform people as to the ramifications of their reproductive interests and population growth will naturally slow as people begin to realize how they are related to the planet and its carrying capacity.

In fact, the only true "government" that can possibly exist is the earth and its resources. From there, all possibilities can be assessed. This is why an intellectual unification of all countries is needed, for the most important information we as a species can have is a full, highly detailed assessment of what we have on this planet. Just as you would examine the land and resources of an acre of land to see what you could do or grow on it, this is what needs to happen with the planet in order to optimize what we are capable of as a species, resource wise.

Of course, many who consider the ideas presented above will often ask: "How can we do this considering the distorted value systems which are currently in operation.? How do we make such a move or transition?" This is, of course, the most difficult question. The answer: We have to start somewhere. There are many things that can be done by a single person or community that can begin to shape this vision. The most important step is education.

On March 15th 2009, ( or "ZDAY" as it was called in 2008 ) there will be a worldwide action day to expand awareness of this sociological direction. Our hope is to have regional meetings in as many cities, states & countries as possible. We here at thezeitgeistmovement.com will work to provide materials in every language we can, while doing whatever we can to help each subgroup. We will never ask for money. We are here to help, for we understand one central truth that has been lost for a long, long time:
The more you give- the more you get.

Thank you for your help.

The official website:
http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/
-sign up here-
Zeitgeist: Addendum - 123 min
http://www.storyofstuff.com/
This is 20 minutes well spent. Sometimes I think this stuff is 'common knowledge'. Unfortunately, I must realize that most people are completely oblivious to the coruption behind everything. Just incase you needed some more proof that the world is F'd up... here you go. This video is done remarkably well, you can even skip ahead and back from various chapters. We have to do something about this situation... but how?

Saturday, October 04, 2008

Zeitgeist: Addendum - 123 min - Oct 3, 2008

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7065205277695921912

Long awaited and slightly behind schedule for the planned October 3rd release date, the sequel to 2007's controversial Internet phenomenon is now available for viewing. Will parts 4, 5, and 6 prove to be as popular as the original documentary?

read more | digg story

Monday, May 05, 2008

NIN releases new, free record today for download
From my inbox:
Trent Reznor to Fans: "Thank you for your continued and loyal support over the years. This one's on me."
As of 12:01 a.m. PST May 5, Nine Inch Nails' brand new full length album The Slip is available as free download at NIN.com.
Unlike NIN's recently released Ghosts I-IV, there are NO paid options available for The Slip, nor are there any retail partners. At present, The Slip is available exclusively as a free download at NIN.com. A physical configuration on CD and vinyl is in the works for a July release.
The Slip marks the first time Nine Inch Nails--or any artist of NIN's stature--has made its new album available completely and exclusively for free as a DRM-free digital download. The Slip is available as a high-quality MP3 or in a variety of lossless formats including, for the first time, a higher-than-CD quality 24 bit 96k version. All downloads include a PDF with credits and artwork.
Like the free single "Discipline" released last week to terrestrial radio stations and their websites and the track "Echoplex" appearing on iLike, The Slip is a classic straightforward NIN album, featuring Trent Reznor on vocals and various instruments as well as Josh Freese, Robin Finck and Alessandro Cortini. The record was produced by Reznor, Atticus Ross and Alan Moulder. Art direction by Rob Sheridan.
As with previous Nine Inch Nails releases Year Zero and Ghosts I-IV, the complete multi-track files to The Slip will be available free at launch, allowing anyone who wants to create his or her own remixes and reinterpretations of the songs. As always, the Remix.NIN.com community will provide a sire and infrastructure for fans to upload, share, stream and download these various remixes as well as the original masters, all free of charge or restrictions.
The Slip, like Ghosts I-IV, is being released under a Creative Commons license, allowing fans to distribute the songs and files freely and without fear of copyright infringement. More details regarding this license can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/

Posted by
document.writeln(showE2("travhay","yahoo.com","Travis Hay"))
Travis Hay


TR,

This is how the world should work.

Great stuff man. See you in Calgary.

RZ





http://www.nin.com/

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

The Future of Art in a Digital World (part 1)

Predicting a future for Art is difficult because the meaning of Art itself depends on ones personal definition of it.

These are some of the other things going on right now…
- Our world is facing a climate crisis.
- Our world will use up all of it’s know resources in 150 years.
- Monks are being tortured
- Humans are starved, diseased and die terrible deaths
- Much of the world in at war.
- Digitization has firmly embedded itself in our culture.

First of all, I believe that we should look at Art as 2 separate complex entities. The 1st one will be called Art and the 2nd one will be called Fine Art.

Art is a very large fluid mental body of interconnections which would encompass our thoughts, feelings, and the way we simply behave and are. Nature, science, the miracle of life and being, are all Art in this sense. Art is an attitude that can create change. Art is optimism. It’s the creative spark that causes anyone to do anything. Sometimes I know that our language has limits when sharing complex ideas. This is where Art and Fine Art can come together. Art is one of those words that must stand in and represent far more than it should. Basically, Art stands for everything that is good.

Fine Art is that thing you learn about in Art History. It thrives in urban centers during prosperous economic times. It has many different periods, mediums and styles. It changes slowly over time. We only hear what we’re supposed to. You know…“history is written by the victorious” or something to that effect. Fine Art has generally been controlled by elitists and the wealthy, which may usually, but not necessarily, mean that inequality is/was present. Fine Art is truly a business which must survive amongst all of the others. Fine Art is in our city. It’s not close to the degree of Paris or New York but it is here. And yes, we have extremely wealthy residence and many homeless poor people. Fine Art should actually be much stronger in city if it were directly relational to the alarming range of personal wealth apparent here. I love Fine Art for many reasons but something does seem to be wrong with some of our historical values. Fine Art moves so slowly that an artist is more likely to get popular after they die.

So how do we integrate more Art into Fine Art?

How can we justify taking part in Fine Art?

Digital Fine Art is not a “cultural distraction” like lots of the media we see. It can be difficult, especially for experts, to determine what can be let through the Fine Art gates. It always depends on who is looking at the situation. I definitely believe that Fine Art should open up it’s focus. People are being raised around computers and will not fear them the way that someone might today.

Digital technology will get deeply involed with Art, as it has with culture.
But things we be different…

The wonders of computation will be used in more thoughtful ways. The purpose or direction of technology is reassessed. Science and technology, under the influence of artists, visionaries, and the collective consciousness of humanity, will get maximized to it's full potential. Things will be invented on a daily basis because everybody is experimenting with technology in new creative ways.

Digital Revolution! ???
- It helps us towards utopia or at least saves us from extinction
- Major advancement in areas like; resources, new understanding of environment/universe, new medical, new jobs, new global sharing systems, and new values (w/Art & Fine Art together).

Art and Culture are so intertwined that they often appear to be one. Like Ying-Yang or partners who require each other to function, possibly like the two halves of our brains?

Image displays the Digital influence on Art and Culture.


This is a link to my short Flash animation of the same concept.

(Please note that for the purpose of clarity more [-] values have been put into the Culture entity and [+] ones have gone into the Art entity. This is not to say that all Cultural values are bad and all Art values good. However, I feel that, historically in our world, the Bad Cultural values have generally ruled over the Good ones, and also the fact that humans are truly oblivious to what is really going on.)

I don’t know if Fine Art will ever go away?

Art, as I have defined it, is something eternal. Fine Art is not.

Fine Art will surely change form and nature as culture changes.

This is a link to my very Young Hae-Chang Heavy Industries style short Flash animation which begins to illustrate may thoughts on this subject.


end part 1




Wednesday, March 19, 2008

TED favorites

I know that the TED.com website is easily accessible to everyone but I felt the need to further push some of the ideas and concepts which I believe are of value to all of us. I will use this section of my blog to post direct links to my TED favorites. This should also give me the opportunity to respond and expand on some of these ideas. I thank you for your interest.

Dave Eggers: 2008 TED Prize wish: Once Upon a School
Karen Armstrong: 2008 TED Prize wish: Charter for Compassion
Jill Bolte Taylor: My stroke of insight
Michael Pollan: The omnivore's next dilemma
Howard Rheingold: Way-new collaboration
Hans Rosling: New insights on poverty and life around the world
Sir Martin Rees: Earth in its final century?

Sir Ken Robinson: Do schools kill creativity?

If you liked those...get the rest at TED.com
More get released everyday.

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Creating a Poverty-Free World
CBC had a short interview with Muhammad Yunus, 2006 Nobel peace prize winner, and it caught my interest. These ideas may be in tune with my optimism towards positive global change. It's definitely a step in the right direction...I wonder how many people would feel the same? I will expand my thoughts on this soon.
The good stuff starts at the 1:30 mark.



Social Business Entrepreneurs Are the Solution

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Oh Creative Commons...Ourmedia and native land...

The cc's are small in stature but big in meaning.
I have been learning about them, and their ideas, for a couple of years now. It was in a MADT200 class called Remix where it all began. I can’t find the old blog but this popped up: http://remixtheory.net/ these pages look incredibly interesting.
Ourmedia is a great way to share your work and still protect your rights. (http://www.ourmedia.org/) I have an image and a number of audio files “archived” with them. There they sit in the digital universe I suppose…forever? I kind of forgot about this stuff. So how it works is that anyone can use my files for whatever they want but if they make money off of them then they must contact me and then we deal.
I’ve used Open Source audio before. I believe in creating my own audio so it is rare for me to do this…but it followed my concept of the assignment. You can see the video here:
ReRemix

It’s pretty long (2 songs) and not my greatest…but it is what it is.

Side note: I should try to build my own video player that would use .flv files which are used by podcasts and are far more efficient then the old (codec) system. I heard somewhere that the encoding procedures on web-video today are the same as they were in the 90’s? Meaning, that possibly, like gasoline, the industry failed to evolve for some reason? (You know the old…why would petro companies, and their governing buddies, want vehicles to find more friendly fuels…a small conflict of interest which screws over everybody.) Check out the discussion tab on this page http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunday/feature_100208.html.
Nowadays we hear about disputes over bandwidth restrictions like it’s a valuable resource. Could it be in someone’s best interest to keep video transfers big and fat? I’ll find out more about this and get back to you.

The Creative Commons idea encourages people to contact the source of their borrowed media, but it’s not a requirement. Connections between artists are morphing and the possibilities are endless. I heard a director, of an animation work I think, getting interviewed at the Oscars. He said that he’s never actually met the sound guy who he worked with on the project. I guess they live on separate sides of the globe and found each other on the net. They passed sample works, digitally, back and forth and only spoke on the telephone once. And I suppose if he’s at the Oscars than it must’ve been a pretty successful collaboration. To be a business partner with a complete stranger…I guess PayPal can make people credible wherever they are.

One last thing about Open Source…as I mentioned in class…I’m seeing the benefits directly (PD fixes). Another one is Audacity, a free digital audio editor that works great. Open Source programs get allot of attention and are constantly improving themselves. Mozilla Firefox and Pure Data (PD) are other Open Source applications which I use a lot because they destroy the competition. I use Phidgets but will soon be using Arduino. Another open-source project.
Copy of comment on another students blog: (ACAD design etc.)
There is more to life than what other people think.
I hope the showing of my "golf art" project, today in interdisciplinary madt, inspired your post.
The ACAD design side is a strange phenomenon. I mean, it's great that they are one of the best around and that most of those students will find prosperous jobs. But at the same time…I don’t really care at all. Maybe I’m a little bitter about getting rejected? You see, I’ve always been at the top of things that I do so it was a tough pill to swallow. I knew that I didn’t take the mandatory “colour fundamentals” class but I thought that they would still want me. I can draw like anyone and am a bottomless pit of ideas. It was probably the written portion of the submission that did me in…(or the fact that I built my portfolio case) I must have showed too much potential for free thought and someone judged that I was not right for design. That’s cool…I’m not bitter…I know that I’m now on the right path. I used to think that my mind was too “engineer like” to become a real artist. Screw that noise…there is plenty of room for rational thinking in new media art.

Tuesday, March 04, 2008

Curating Immateriality…
Yes, the issues here are pretty clear. My feelings towards these things are, I believe, rather well informed. My time as an art student has been extremely interesting. I have been determined to find out about this thing called art & am now mixed up in the civil-war within it. We are in changing times and it is painful for the old world to adjust to new ideas. I find it absurd to suggest that art can’t or shouldn’t be immaterial. What could be more immaterial then the imagination? Art has always originated from the imagination. So art has and will always have some immateriality to it. Our minds can obviously make sense of things which are not in our reality. We are not mere animals, our brains work on levels far beyond anything else here. That being said, I do realize that things like our feelings and consciousness could be constructions of nature which have formed to help us survive. (My thoughts are echoed at TED by Michael Pollan http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/214 )
Anyway, the most important thing I got from chapter 1 of Curating Immateriality by Joasia Kryss can be triggered with the statement “transformed the nature of art”. If we can accept this idea that “the nature” of art as something that will change depending on the culture and society around it, then new media will soon be considered a credible high art. I see the "nature of art" statement, even for those diehard old art types, to be impossible to deny. The museums and art galleries of the future will be very different than those of today and the past.
I don’t see the whole archiving thing to be that big of a deal. I must not understand the full story or something? Are they worried about media getting damaged or outdated? Can’t we record these works it by writing about them or using technology like video? ARS Electronica and communities of artists are still kind of archiving this history...as we are making it.
It's like the established museums don't know what to do with us. It would be a challenge to curate the immaterial but it’s far from impossible.
Career Goals…Agent, Critic, Artist, Educator, Social Business Entrepreneur?
I would love to have a job which allowed me to travel and have lots of free time. I was once a slave to the system and I won’t let that happen again. For the first time, maybe ever, I know what direction to go. I see my life as being full of opportunity and the future is open for me to create. Above all, I stand for making our world a better place. This can be done on a number of levels and in so many different ways. I am awake, I have a voice, and I can contribute to the solution. In some cases the issues that we challenge may extend beyond our lifetimes. We should each be able to sacrifice a little now to help insure a prosperous future.
So where does someone like me fit into the working world? I don’t know of an official term for what I want to be but “agent” might be close. Some of my activities may include connecting things…people, ideas, artists, communities, actions. Or even standing up to things that I know are wrong or unjust. In a way, an agent could be seen as a soldier, fighting for their beliefs and values. We are truly in a war, one like never before, it is taking place in our collective thoughts, and we must make our move while there is still time. Revolution! Sometimes I wonder about my role...can I really make a difference?
I have also thought about being a critic. A critic could be very closely tied to an agent in a number of respects. Both would include speaking your mind, investigating things, sharing your ideas, and all with the intention to help others. A critic of art, new media art, products, services, technology and just about anything you can think of. I’m not really sure how I would get to this goal? Do I just start my own website with many daily activities and updates which would have a healthy following of viewers, readers, and contributors?
As a full time new media artist I would have to participate with galleries and really try to get myself known and out there. This path might have to start off as a part-time hobby but if positive things started to happen than this would be an extremely rewarding direction. I have also thought about making video documentaries, I would get to travel, create art, and fill my responsibilities as an agent.
ADD ON: March 18 2008
I’ve thought about teaching before but the situation would have to be right. (I remember what school kids can be like from the age of 12-18…have I got some stories) Anyway, the existing primary school system could be vastly improved. I would love to express ideas about this very soon. The topic can get into a sticky mess in a hurry. What to do with the youth? Should they be encouraged to follow their own ways? I mean, looking from the perspective that different individuals have different gifts. I would strongly consider being an instructor…if it is where I’d do the most good?
The next day I watched this video http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/view/id/233
Dave Eggers: 2008 TED Prize wish: Once Upon a School. It's 25 minutes well spent.

As noted in the ”Creating a Poverty-Free World” post… “Social Business Entrepreneurs are the answer”. So where so I sign up? I need to find out more about this kind of stuff!?
In the distant future…our GWS (Global World System) will have room for everybody. No more poverty! Give everyone a get a chance to live! Our collective consciousness is waking and soon we will make a difference. For now I will just spread the ideas around.

I plan to do more research in these areas and will update the blog as things develop.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

RE: can we plan 1000 years into the future?

If a 1000 year leap in time seems crazy then you are not alone. I see it, the below blog post, as more of a fun and imaginative exercise for your mind. Of course, the only way to handle current world issues is to work on what we can right now. Setting goals and planning is always a good idea for any individual or any collective system. We, as humans with knowledge and technology, should be able to observe and manage the entire global system (Us, the people, the animals, plants, environment, resources etc). It could really be that simple. A sort of collective intelligence will put everyone on the same page. Any kind of governing body would be skeletal in form and held accountable by the collective opinions and feelings of the people. So yeah, this kind of stuff is starting to develop right now. I would hope that, within 50 years, collective intelligence will begin to correct the path of humanity towards a beautiful future.

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Can we plan 1000 years into the future?


There will always be variables which are out of our control like ice ages, meteors, other natural disasters and the unexplained. We can steer other factors like the direction of science, technology, our environment and relations with each other.

I challenge people to imagine 1000 years into the future. What condition will the Earth &/or humanity be in? I wonder what kinds of things people would come up with? Will they be positive or negative? I would like people to think of any/all possible aspects, economy, arts, environment, culture, technology, government, etc.

I will accept anything...point form notes, key words, art, essays, etc.
Just provide me with: sex, age, name, background...(I can keep your name private if you would want that?) I can setup an online survey and spot for posting the submitted images and new media artworks.

My hypothesis is that most will lean towards, but not hope for, the extinction of humanity and Earth. Or is that 2 different questions? Will we really be able to move on and survive without Earth? Maybe we could bring the DNA of every animal and lots of seeds? We need a sort of a future space version of Noah’s Ark. Thinking about the emptiness of space, there is so little matter in the universe relative to anti-matter, it’s kind of like we are in the void dimension. I mean, finding another planet like Earth is probably impossible. It’s also interesting to think about our perception of time. In the “big picture” 1000 of our years are, like the matter in this universe, virtually nothing. In some perspectives we were never here or we are already doomed. Is that how close we are to extinction?

Our world is worth fighting for. Even if this reality is something we often question. We must stop and remember that this reality is truly special. Lets come up with a plan to save the planet.
I'm thankful to have another 50 years in this place.
You know I’d love to come back sometime to visit. Who knows?
Peace, Ryan Zacher
(The RZ3000 Project is made possible by The Neo-Futurists)

The time frame is still up in the air...
If you are at all interested in participating please leave a comment or mail me at ryan@RZ3000.com
Art and Commerce Manifesto by Ryan W. Zacher

There are some key ideas which must be explained in order to better understand our present situation. The “Culture industry” is a term used to describe an economic system which exploits world resources and relies on the masses to buy large quantities of factory produced goods (“Culture Industry”). Most people are unaware that they are part of this massive system. Almost everything around us has been created by the “culture industry”. We are so immersed in it that the system becomes invisible. We must understand that the “culture industry” is the cause of many problems. Some of these problems include; exploitation of people & resources, permanent environmental damage, health issues for generations to come, and possibly even the de-evolution of human beings. Those are each entire papers on their own which I will get to in due time.

Now, this ugly monster called the “culture industry” is responsible for all of the fun material possessions in your life. One should feel a certain amount of guilt knowing that your luxuries are only possible because someone else somewhere has been robbed of their rights. True happiness has absolutely nothing to do with wealth and material possessions. The “culture industry” is tied in directly to mass production (industrial factory), mass media (commercials and movies), and even pop culture (what people like, right or wrong, becomes popular and infused into the culture forever). So when Johanna Drucker says that “art today is distinguished by its embrace of commerce and values of the mass media”, I must interject (Davis 1). Is she suggesting that art must share values with a henchman of the “culture industries”? Surely she must be mistaken. Drucker digs herself a deeper hole by claiming that “this loss of art’s distinction as an alternative to the media spectacle is not just one of artist’s choice but an existential condition for all artists, and therefore something that should be embraced”(Davis 1). I suppose that she is free to her own opinion but when her thoughts have the potential to influence others opinions on a subject as delicate as this then we must reciprocate like Davis. He defends the values of art by exposing holes in Drucker’s logic. Davis explains that “Drucker overlooks...the unstable, self-sabotaging nature of this ‘complicit’ condition. In debunking the platitudes of her academic peers, Drucker underplays the crisis that the blurring of ‘high’ art and media spectacle represents, and the weird place that art finds itself as a result” (Davis 1). In other words, in these confusing and quickly changing times, we must protect the values of fine art at all costs. Davis and I are supporting an alternative idea to a merge between fine art and the “culture industry”. A contemporary “art economy” should stand up for what is right and challenge the “culture economy”. If we submit to the values of mass production than art will die, and our planet and species will follow closely behind.

The industrial revolution changed the global economy and our ideas of material and visual culture. Capitalism has brought intense competition among products, made a few people rich, and left many people poor. Advertisements are aggressive as they battle for the consumer’s ever-shortening attention span. The increase of visual stimuli over the last 50 years has affected the way that people see. The “culture industry” has increased the demand for designers and artistic minded people, which sounds good at first, but we could actually be adding to the problem. Working for a massive corporation monopoly has some benefits. But you need a pretty cold heart to knowingly contribute to everything that is wrong and unjust in our world. We must be conscious of these “cultural industry” issues and use our power, as new media artists in an otherwise free world, to evoke positive change. Artists must understand the differences between high art and the values of mass culture.

As artists we must act. The values of art (aesthetics, morality, individuality, originality, and even spirituality) can combat the false values (material possessions, status/class divisions, utility, questionably reliability, quick-fix disposable products, and shopping) of the cultural industry. Art is autonomous and makes its own rules. Art is an entity completely outside of the “cultural industry”. Art could be the kryptonite needed to take down the monstrous cultural industries. Art has survived through adversity before and must do something about these issues.
The lack of respect for the Earth has become sickening. I would like to think that most people, in the masses, would make different choices if they knew the truth of the matter and understood their position within it.

The future could go many different ways. Here are a few possible scenarios:

a. Two distinct classes emerge. One class only uses mass produced items, is generally uneducated, and has no appreciation for originality, individuality, or art. The other class will be filled with artists, well educated, and environmentally conscious people. They have amazing resiliency and create what they need with what we have. An elite society with strong values and morals. Well, at least in one of the classes.

b. The world gets on track. Technology gets to a point where the resources of the world are tracked and protected. Virtual grids are created to best optimize the sharing of resources and wealth. Equality, for the first time in human history, will include everybody. Art is seen as a divine gift and artists are seen as key members of the society. Mass production may still need to be part of the world but it will be controlled as to not exploit people and produce unneeded materials.

c. This one is not good. Art dies. Values change. The world becomes increasingly worse until it implodes. Humans de-evolve into mindless consumers and 1% of the people control the other 99%.


MADT 411 - Studio Seminar - Feb.6, 2008

Alien RA has been released with a new name :) Visit my REDBUBBLE SHOP!